UK: Hartlepool Nuclear Power Station Blockaded For Ten Hours

Uranium fuelled power generation is NOT a remediation for supposition' of 'climate issues', but of Electrical Generation issues. How can 'coal utilities' be removed otherwise, there is little apart from Uranium that can otherwise fuel the required production of Electricity. WIND FARMS cannot do so and are not capable regardless of OPINION to the contrary, observation of established systems indicated the REAL (lack) of ability for these Wind Farms. Wind farms producing a rated 20 MW input even less to the grid after rectification and so cannot be used to replace 1000MW inputs not needing rectification even.
"Solar Utilities" are no better placed either. It really is time for the attempt to opinion over reality inherent in the attitude of the 'greenhouse brigands' gives way to REALITY.

It is that SCIENCE knows that climate is changing, there is only ever expected persistence of situation within any portion of the overall climate cycle with irregularly periodic alterations being natural. There is not however any valid reason to cite any unnatural ('greenhouse') alterations to the ponderous motions of Climate by only pretentiously platformed 'opinion' from a small set of self-interested lobbyists. If you notice the reality of the warmer ocean surface, you will see that this trend follows the present Land Surface rise in 'shape' even, lagging by 15 years due to the productions of Conduction and Convection transporting that Kinetic Energy TO the Ocean Surface whilst the muting of that displayed trend is due to internal production of Turbulence in the Ocean surface as reaction to those inputs of Kinetic Energy (this trend is seen in plots at the link * below). There is nothing UNNATURAL in the production of the 'Katrina Event' (as example) that can contain ANY result of 'greenhouse supposition', and ONLY the cumulative effect from the production of Human Habitat Sprawl upon the land surface (related to Human Population growth in its rapid rise from 500 Million to over 6 Billion in ~400 years) can be seen (again with slides in *).

There is NOT possible a 'greenhouse effect' as the 'greenhouse theory' describes, and Temperature is NOT even a valid indicator of supposed UNNATURAL 'Climate Change' in any VALID manner of SCIENCE. When 'temperature' is mentioned, realise that the 'temperature' of a System is that Kinetic Energy residual within the materials constituting that System that is NOT directly involved in the production of the processes of Turbulence within that System. In a System where-in the Mass of the most involved materials contained is proportioned in kilogramsx10^24, then alterations to Turbulence within those materials WILL release (or uptake) vast amounts of Kinetic Energy, and that this will then be observed as a RISE (or DECLINE) in the measured 'temperature' of the System with NO NEED for alteration of the RATE of overall 'new' Kinetic Energy production. Interaction of Oceanic (slower) and Atmospheric (faster) process will see the style of variation of TEMPERATURE seen so far.

Realise the 'temperature rise' oft mentioned is of the planetary surface, it is the planetary surface that is being rematerialed and it is the REMATERIALING that is altering Energy interactions in style and Spectrum of Energy that is producing the observed rise in median temperature. It is NOT possible for a 'greenhouse warming process' to even have been existent; the 'greenhouse effect' is inconsistent with the materials it involves as these materials present their ACTUAL behaviours, this is inclusive of those materials presented on the surface as well as with those 'bio-forms' of surface life as they exist NOW. It is NOT possible for the 'greenhouse theory' to produce in reality a 'warming effect' as it is supposed, with manipulation of Energy within the 'Infrared Region' with regard to the real materials present (including those materials involved/contained in 'life forms'. Next notice the material in the link (with all thanks and notice to the author and references there in included):- http://www-ssc.igpp.ucla.edu/personnel/russell/papers/venus_mag/

The Earth in it's orbit trails a small 'gas tail', this being retained by interactions of the Planetary Magnetic Field, Radiation and the upper edges of the Atmosphere. This 'Gas Tail' would be lost constantly, perhaps 'blown away' by the 'Solar Wind' or just left behind due to alteration of the velocity vector from the Earth's orbital motion if not for Gravity AND the Dipole 'plasma production'. The 'atmospheric density' of Venus can be explained by that now 'present' atmosphere being a production of the loss of the original 'atmosphere' as the Dipole field reduced to it's present 'practically nil' levels. The RAPIDITY of that 'field reduction', if sufficient, would create a 'surface pressure boil' increasing 'atmospheric density/mass' able to support higher store of kinetic energy. So a more Turbulent atmosphere would become warmer.
Also it is that Venus is NOW potentially losing its Atmosphere (rate related to gravity well determinations) and the overall conditions are related to the 'loss' of that original 'dipole' with then relationship made of notice to which 'Planets' in this Solar System present 'Earth-like Dipoles'.

After 20 years of 'greenhouse hype', enough IS enough and to highlight this I notice that Mr Gore is to be in Australia this weekend to promote 'his Movie', containing as it does little TRUTH in Reality, having just such mentioned in the 'title'. I notice a local Newspaper is 'advertising' for school children to attend a 'special meeting'. I remember reading of other 'political movements' promoting themselves with (and through) children and 'youth movements' with regard to mention's of 'science' within the 'platformed' opinion.

The CONTINUANCE of 'life as we know it', if that is the 'common concern' of the present 'environmental activist', is NOT in any study of a supposed 'greenhouse effect' (non existent) or even other Planets and their Atmospheres. The focus of 'notice' needed is 'here' (Earth) & with general concern for 'Dipole flipping' & how LITTLE is known of such processes. Enough of this 'greenhouse nonscience'...after 20 years of nothing but opinion, movies and novels time to IGNORE the 'greenhouse lobby'.

The study in SCIENCE needed to protect 'life as we know it' needing MORE 'Public notice/concern' is in the production & consistent persistence of the Planetary Dipole, in both it's processes of production AND continuance.

Your's,
Peter K. Anderson a.k.a. Hartlod(tm)
From the PC of Peter K Anderson
E-Mail: Hartlod@bigpond.com
http://hartlod.blogspot.com/