Oil is Plentiful - The Earth keeps Producing it - Hydrocarbon fuels are not "fossil fuels"
Categories:
In addition, hydrocarbon fuels are not even fossil fuels. There is no evidence that oil or natural gas is produced by broken down biological material. In fact, oil has been found on asteroids.
There is no evidence of a biological origin of petroleum. Oil is produced *by natural processes within the earth*. For a start, see:
http://www.prisonplanet.com/archives/peak_oil/
http://www.infowars.com/articles/economy/peak_oil_index.htm
http://prisonplanet.com/Pages/Oct05/041005oil.htm
http://www.thebirdman.org/Index/Temp/Temp-PeakOilIsAScam-Babe.htm
http://www.vialls.com/wecontrolamerica/peakoil.html
http://www.oilcrash.com/articles/jones_01.htm
http://www.oilempire.us/abiotic.html
Add this to the fact that climate change including "global warming" is a hoax, and humanity has basically nothing to be sorry for or to feel guilty about. The only thing we did wrong is to listen to the globalists, succumb to their scams of:
- environmentalism
- staged terrorism
- extreme feminism
- drug-running
- gun confiscation
- dumbing down of the education system
- control over the media
- control over the money supply through their private ownership of the central banks
and thereby let them destroy our society and insult our intelligence.
Veracity
This non-information doesn't desreve attention. If there's self replentishment of oil go make yourself rich by buying spent fields in OK.
This 'article' is rubbish. Yes, Virginia, there is global warming. Read any of the accurate articles here.
fundamentally unclear .
scientifically nothing is said.
Firstly in every case where 'unexplained flows ' or deeper resources
(the russian ukrainian method apparently..becus nothing is said about what that specifically would comprive, then probably no magnitudes of abiotic fuel.)
are mentioned it is stated this is oil from a different age.
To hype up computer advances, corporate scams on states and private persons, and the huge environmental and human investments to new and consumer 'fossil' fuel to some ET stream of interterrestrial non biotic oil oceans is unnecessarily optimistic. And quitte of the line.
It's after all oil of a different geological age, naturally to be sure,
(always older) wich can only be and would be worldbreaking news for weeks if it wasn't proven through her (ex)biological age.
Even I know more about this then i see mentioned in the whole array of 'scam' articles. Wich is a real problem because it apologyses the exploit of the other continents (sudan is mentioned and a row of other areas).
For instance it is a most common phenomena that over different geological periods the same area would develop similar characteristics (depending the climate) regularly, if not even always.
So when there is oil, there is always (99% of the cases), a bit more,
a bit higher, or deeper.
Sometimes it's enough to be usefull. sometimes not.
It depends age and scale, and had i the data, i could calculate, strange things.
(interesting would be average comparisons of the really older oils,
with the lower quality level oils bulk, on top of them.)
You might pretty well be capable to extract an all-time-maximal-reserve from that after all.
I am not all that sure about the mechanics, the cambrian era was a very peacefull time for many organisms and it's rather fascinating.
Pre cambrian oil is also plausible, and necessarilly developed in an ever calmer environment, since however it all is a direct result of the earths climate, as far as i know, even that would be predictable from this data.
*My* guess is precambrian oil doesnt add up to much.
I think i would know if there was such a thing as 4 billion year old oil.
The most logical explanation for that would be prohibitive geological circumstances against life..
It's a well known theory at first the planet was much hotter and vulcanic.
In that sense science recently put the picture (of life as a bulky appearance) back a little wich might well reflect 'russian' (socialist?) research , because indeed it directly follows from this line of thought.
In fact instead of saying : oil appears when live appears, you might say : oil appeared when a climate appeared.
Perhaps that defintion is still usefull in oil prospection.
That besides... that there is a hoax about prices in the holliday season,
that many a war is fared, these are things that shan't be overlooked,
and should not be, what i experience as, mystified by fairy-tales.
memos on bringing back capacity proof nothing even ecologically.
Ofcourse we still need memo's to bring back capacity and use of fuels.
Another such example is also in this sites actuality,
coal-fires. Well hidden in all these articles stays, that the majority of damage through coal fires is a result of exploitation, litterally and figuratively by (mostly white) humans.
It's definetly not needed that it stays a mystery to you all.
Actually, King Hubbert's
Actually, King Hubbert's prediction of a peak in US production in the 70s was fulfilled.
The problem was that many misunderstood his prediction as being 'US oil will run out in the 70s".
I was using 'production' in
I was using 'production' in it's common-or-garden definition. I should probably have used the term 'extraction'.
Geologists have not looked everywhere
Peak oil will someday come, but not for quite a while.
A major find came this year in Utah, in a place overlooked by geologists. Many parts of the world are overlooked. BIG parts. Which parts, you ask? Siberia, Western Africa, are just two places.
The peak oil predictions haven't come true since their inception. Someday they will, but not while we are alive.
Don't buy into the politics of scare tactics. People make money off scaring you.
Re: Fundamental misunderstanding of peak oil
If we limit ourselves just to the mineral oil deposits, then the rate of production is virtually zero. So the above comment would apply to throughout the last 100 or so years of oil consumption. The amount of oil deposits is finite and geologist now beleive we have found every major oil field on earth. Further much of the easily accessable oil has been extracted. Much of the remaining oil is in the form of oil shale, much harder to extract, more expensive, and potentially more environmentally damaging to extract. Untill the last year or so it was not economically viable to extract oil from oil shale,
Fundamental misunderstanding of peak oil
It doesn't matter by what process oil is produced; whether biological or abiotic. The point is, the rate of production and humankind's rate of extraction. If the latter exceeds the former, prices for every oil-derived good (from transport, to heating, to food grown with artificial fertilizers, to concrete and to medicines) will increase dramatically.
Peak oil is not concerned with oil 'running out', merely that our rate of use will exceed the rate at which we can extract it from the ground.
Post new comment