Kidnappings in Nigeria reflect people's disgust with oil companies

I thought little vague in my outline, however if you would look at the link I made, that being

http://www.climateimc.org/?q=node/312

you would see that it is indeed possible for a Human induced effect to be present; it is that such cannot involve CO2, due to the realities of SCIENCE and the properties OF CO2.

It is that the cultural and ethnic 'interactions' within African culture are wrought in violence, and conflict IS established to control OIL for its fiscal advantage. This is widely known.

Personal wealth is much LESS important to the 'average' African at present, as the AVERAGE AGE is less than 15 still.

The provisioning of food and medical support is more vital, the construction of infrastructure to support such provisioning even more so. It is this that the 'terrorists/rebels' attack, as well as the facilities established to prodeuce teh wealth to faciliate further improvements.

It is also known of the trade in Human cargo and other more unpleasant issues.

The attempt to promote western rhetoric over the actual needs of the majority of the people of Africa is far too common within the 'western environmental ideology'.

All the 'western' based propaganda has done is closed the eyes and minds of the 'western believers'. In the next few decades, if not sooner, 'western attitudes' will be reduced in relevance as population distribution alters the situation of International Politics.

See also http://www.climateimc.org/?q=node/312 (with slides also.)

It seems that indoctrination of belief in a concept, as is tried in relation to 'greenhouse warming' concepts, produces little real justification for the 'belief' and little displayed comprehension of the realities beneath the situations our society presents. For example, fossil oil is not only used for fuel, and apart from eating it, Humanity has become near totally reliant on 'fossil' derivatives for everything from hosiery to carpet, cloths to cars, and furniture to homes. Look for the word 'synthetic' and begin to realise.

The situation is that ALL the other products derived from fossil oils will STILL be needed, so the diffraction of fossil oils WILL continue, and so there WILL be fossil oil based fuel products, but maybe not in the same volume, which will be supplemented with bio-fuel oil volume and be combustible in present technology engine designs near immediately often with little alteration.

One Humanity realises it is NOT above the 'natural law', stops being worrisome of its future and makes some attempt to notice NATURE, rather than opinions regarding the 'nature of nature', Humanity can dispose of the providers' of rhetoric, masquerading their propaganda as 'climate science research' with it's cavalcade of 'talking heads' presenters.

To quote Dr. Michael Pidwirny (slides provided, Figure seen in link above):-
["By 2050, the oldest countries of the world will be Canada, Russia, China, Japan, Thailand, and almost all of Europe. Some other areas of the world affected by ageing will be the United States, Mexico, Australia, New Zealand, most of South America, Northern Africa, India, the Caribbean, and some other Asian nations. Africa will be the youngest major area of the world with about twice as many children as elderly."] ["The ageing of the world's population will have several important socioeconomic impacts. Currently, the economic productivity of young people plays an important role in financially supporting a variety of social programs in more developed countries. In the future, this economic productivity will be significantly reduced."] ["Many counties will probably increase retirement age in the future to lower financial payments to pension plans. It is also possible that many countries will have a hard time financing government supported health care programs. A United Nations report (Replacement Migration: Is It a Solution to Declining and Ageing Populations?) has suggested that countries experiencing problems due to an ageing population (and population growth rate decline) should adopt policies encouraging replacement migration. Replacement migration can be defined as the international migration that a country would require to offset population decline and population ageing resulting from low fertility and mortality rates."]

In short, most 'western nations' with their loud AGING 'activists' demanding 'Kyoto, Kyoto' and 'beware change', will simply cease to be relevant to the newer economies of younger and more VIGOROUS nations. The 'western GW platform' seems also deliberately avoiding that there has been a noted warming/cooling/warming mini oscillation occurring in global climate since 1880. This micro-oscillation has been noted in many comments in many places by many people.

There is also the motion of human population across the surface in line with population growth, with the alteration of the surface associated with this increase in population that has led to alterations of what would be 'pleasant green terrain' to become covered to various densities in coverage of concrete and asphalt. WE all know that concrete and asphalt get very much hotter than even grassed terrain, and this has led to the small increase in average SURFACE temperatures observed as 0.6 degrees C.

The population motion will also be directed, if you consider the geographical distribution of present population density, overlay marginal terrain (deserts etc) you will see where the population growth distributed by presently 'lesser developed nations' shown as the lighter colour in the column graph, will spread whilst the darker colour of the columns graph, the present 'developed nations' will stagnate in size and sprawl. Again slides in link as shown.

The resurfacing will thus spread through what is now mostly 'greened spaces'. If you look at the geographical plot you will note the 'empty space' above India and west of the Chinese coast. This is one place I proposed would see population sprawl in attempts to discuss this all in various places.

The overall natural climate cycle saw an 'Ice Age' being to revert ~20,000 years ago, which occupies the 'trough' of the climate oscillation. We are all now at, if not even within, the 'peak' of that oscillation. WE have a dry equatorial zone, with a heavily photosynthetic covering of the temperate zone (if you include the photosynthetic mass so far removed by Humanity within the last 400 years) and warming Polar Regions.

There is no reason to think that the motion of the oscillation peak will progress any faster than through a trough (and its often contained "Ice Age") and so 'peak oscillation climate fluctuations' could last multiple centuries.

As such the 'peak' will present shifting behaviors; in as far as Humanity defines 'seasons' (which need not be considered 'natural and permanent' being definitions OF Humanity only) without any needed periodicity in these alterations. Rain patterning will alter its density and distribution. Wind and ocean currents will show some disturbances to various degrees.

These will manifest differing behaviors within regions that are NOT 'global' in scale. One such region is in and around the Gulf of Mexico, which can at this point within the oscillation, produce storms of vast surface coverage from little more kinetic energy than currently available. These events are those that open the multiple sea channels along the Florida coastline and nearby environs (New Orleans for example has seen ONE open) which produce the 'Lake Land' that the State of Florida region HAS been in the 'past'.

The rhetoric to 'deal with climate change' by trying to stop it is as pointless as attempting to stop the tide. It is that most of majority agree we need to DEAL with it, that is to accept it is NATURAL and ongoing, not as some attempt to imply (with attachments of other policy) as being agreeing to 'greenhouse' innuendo of influence.

Your's, Peter K. Anderson a.k.a. Hartlod(tm)
From the PC of Peter K Anderson
E-Mail: Hartlod@bigpond.com