Radar Altimetry Confirms Global Warming Is Affecting Polar Glaciers
Categories:
Scientists have confirmed that climate warming is changing how much water remains locked in the Antarctic and Greenland ice sheets, according to an article published in the Journal of Glaciology.
Using radar altimeter data from ESA’s ERS-1 and ERS-2, Jay Zwally, a scientist at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, and his colleagues mapped the height of the ice sheets and found there was a net loss of ice from the combined sheets between 1992 and 2002 and a corresponding rise in sea level.
Polar ice plays a crucial role in regulating global climate because it reflects about 80 percent of the incoming sunlight. If the ice caps over the polar ocean melt, the ocean water would absorb a large part of the radiation energy, which would lead to further melting of the ice and further warming of the climate.
According to the NASA study, published in the March edition, 20 billion net tonnes of water are added to oceans each year as a result of Greenland’s ice sheet gaining some 11 billion tonnes of water annually, while Antarctica loses about 31 billion tonnes per year.
The study found that Antarctica lost much more ice to the sea than it gained from snowfall, resulting in an increase in sea level, while the Greenland ice sheet gained more ice from snowfall at high altitudes than it lost from melting ice along its coast.
A recent study by Eric Rignot of NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory and University of Kansas scientist Pannir Kanagaratnam, published in Science in February, showed Greenland glaciers are melting into the sea twice as fast as previously believed.
Using satellite data collected between 1996 and 2005 by ESA’s remote sensing satellites ERS-1 and ERS-2, ESA’s Envisat and Canada’s Radarsat-1, they found Greenland’s southern glaciers are now dumping twice as much ice yearly into the Atlantic as they did in 1996, accounting for nearly 17 percent of the estimated 2.54 millimetre annual rise in global sea levels.
The fact that the Greenland glaciers are melting, as determined in Rignot’s study, coupled with the new findings that Greenland’s glaciers are gaining more snow at the top suggests global warming is affecting the ice sheets. When the environment becomes warmer, it builds up water in the atmosphere which can then increase snow fall over Greenland. At the same time, however, the oceans are warming causing the outer sheets of ice to melt.
The question of whether and to what extent global climate change is causing the polar ice caps to shrink is one of the topics being addressed by glaciologists, hydrologists, oceanographers and geodesists from around the world at the ‘15 Years of Progress in Radar Altimetry’ symposium in Venice, Italy, from 13-18 March 2006.
For the last 15 years, radar altimetry – an instrument originally designed to measure the sea surface height – has been successful in measuring large-scale homogenous ice surfaces of Greenland and Antarctica and providing initial global monitoring results for sea ice thickness.
However, in an effort to improve the understanding of the relationship between the Earth’s ice cover and global climate, ESA designed a mission, called CryoSat, to provide detailed views of irregular sloping edges of land ice, as well as non-homogenous ocean ice over a three-year period.
Unfortunately, the mission was lost, on 8 October 2005, due to a malfunction of the Russian rocket launcher. But on 24 February 2006, ESA received the green light from its Member States to build and launch a CryoSat recovery mission, CryoSat-2.
CryoSat-2 will be equipped with an enhanced radar altimeter instrument, called the Synthetic Aperture Interferometric Radar Altimeter (SIRAL), that will allow it to send 17 800 separate radar pulses per second down to Earth per second then record how long their echoes take to bounce back. Currently, the second generation radar altimeter on ESA's Envisat measures height using the same technique, but sends 1800 pulses down to Earth.
It is important to carry on monitoring over Greenland and Antarctica because the long-term observations by satellites provide authoritative evidence of trends and enable estimation of the consequences should such melting continue into the future.
_________________________
link: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/03/060317112333.htm
(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.)
Perhaps more attention needs to be paid to what IS known.
Firstly, simple alteration in 'temperature' is NOT, in any valid manner, a 'signature of climate change' and producing such AS a 'signature' is NOT a valid inference from only 'decades' of observation. The ice is melting as the air temperature in that region rises.
The Oceans represent a mass of ~0.0014x10^24 kilograms.
This is in total ~1,400,000,000 billion tonnes.
50 billion tonnes represents ~0.00000357% of the total Ocean mass and at the rate of 50 billion tonnes Nett per year it would take ~280,112 years for a single 1% of total Oceanic mass to be added. At which point can we expect 'climate science' to cease making 'reports' based on only decades?
It needs also to be realised that Turbulence is based in its production on differentials, NOT absolutes of measurement, of pressure/temperature. The extreme cold air of the polar regions will show increases in temperature more rapidly as it is denser, and less able to display 'rapid' alterations to regional turbulent effects, as can other regions (with regard to the 'surface') of the atmosphere.
This is infact ALL that is happening and is very readily understood. This is WHY the Polar Regions are now showing 'more' effect (i.e. ice melting), it is simply more 'observable' as being 'different'.
It is not 'polar amplification', or any other imposingly named 'effect', or even 'unnatural climate alteration', be it as a 'signature' or any other 'platformed rhetoric'. It is simply the end play of a warming process that began obvious effect ~15000 years ago, and is again at a stage where once again DIFFERENTIALS make the process obvious. It is infact NOT evidence to suggest that a 'greenhouse warming effect' is existent and most certainly is NOT 'trapping heat', the entire concept of such a 'greenhouse effect' ignores the known actual materials behaviors whilst attempting to impose hypothetical materials behaviors of the 19th Century, a major reason the 'greenhouse concepts' did not gain validation, failing on all three (3) attempts made.
The 'variations' over the 'continent' show variations due to Turbulence WITHIN the 'continental region' as increases in turbulent process (due to regional differentials) will result in a lower residual of kinetic energy that can be then measured as 'air temperature', that energy no longer 'residual' will have been producing 'Work' on the masses involved (to move them as example) that are having their 'temperature' measured.
As marvelous as the technology sounds, the 'gee wiz' status it is NOT a substitute for solid and valid SCIENCE, sadly lacking is no much of current 'climate science' where the 'invention' as a concept has become 'contrivance' in reality.
Perhaps more attention needs to be paid to what IS known of SCIENCE, and the 'inventors' reigned in.
Your's, Peter K. Anderson a.k.a. Hartlod(tm)
From the PC of Peter K Anderson
E-Mail: Hartlod@bigpond.com
Post new comment