Heat Rising at the Washington Post

'Scientists' or SCIENCE? The attempt to platform 'greenhouse fears' on a basis of WHO is speaking is to lower the attention in regard to WHAT is being said.

Climate has always been 'changing'; there is as such nothing really to debate about such 'change' being 'existent'. See the link: - http://www.climateimc.org/?q=node/348 for more detail.

There is not however able to be produced in valid SCIENCE an outline of a 'greenhouse effect' that notices the actual properties of CO2 (and the other labeled 'greenhouse gases'). There is not possible therefore, as outlined by the 'greenhouse theory', a 'greenhouse effect'. See the link: - http://www.climateimc.org/?q=node/312 for more detail.

Simple alteration in 'temperature' is NOT, in any valid manner, a 'signature of climate change' and producing such AS a 'signature' is NOT a valid inference from only 'decades' of observation.

To example what the 'WHO over the WHAT' rhetorical process is avoiding, notice the 'Ice is melting' platform.

The Oceans represent a mass of ~0.0014x10^24 kilograms.
This is in total ~1,400,000,000 billion tonnes.
50 billion tonnes represents ~0.00000357% of the total Ocean mass and at the rate of 50 billion tonnes Nett per year (current expectation) it would take ~280,112 years for a single 1% of total Oceanic mass to be added. However only ~2% of all water is 'trapped' (some being as Ice), so to 'free' half of the total trapped reserves will take ~280 Thousand Years (at the currently estimated rate of Nett release).

At which point can we expect 'climate science' to cease making 'reports' based on only decades?

At which point can we expect 'climate science' to cease making a 'philosophical' platform of 'Scare, Doom and Woe', literally from nothing, to justify itself?

Perhaps more attention needs to be paid to what IS known of SCIENCE, our reality, and less to the 'authors of opinion'.

There is a potential problem encompassed within the treatment Humanity is producing upon the Planetary Surface. It is simply NOT needed however for a contrived 'Sword of (Greenhouse) Damocles' to be foisted upon the public by the few 'self appointed'.

Your's, Peter K. Anderson a.k.a. Hartlod(tm)
From the PC of Peter K Anderson
E-Mail: Hartlod@bigpond.com