The false positive...

Climate is changing, always but not always obviously.

Now is special due to NOW being obvious.

The gases labeled as 'greenhouse gases' are however incapable of producing any affect that would be as described as the 'greenhouse effect' as outlined.

The only link is in time, but at a time when other significant effects are being produced, and only OPINION has ever been attempted to platform 'greenhouse' concepts, and opinion of a scientist is NOT a validation of SCIENCE.

Pollution is still relevant, but a supposed 'greenhouse effects' is not in any regard 'changing climate', or even itself possible. The continued attempt to bully 'greenhouse opinion' is only shortening the path to Uranium, and I have been attempting to indicate this for 5 years, and now to it is being made obvious that Uranium is 'happening'.

NOW all that can be done is to IGNORE further 'greenhouse opinions', and begin again discussion to limit the use of Uranium by use of Gas fuelled generation where possible, and Gas as vehicle fuel, common here in Australia.

Your's
Peter K Anderson aka Hartlod
hartlod@bigpond.com
(The word 'Hartlod' in the registered Trademark of Peter K Anderson.)

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Add image
  • Allowed HTML tags: <img> <p> <b> <i> <a> <u> <br> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote> <del> <sup> <sub> <hr> <div> <table> <tr> <td> <thead> <tbody> <caption> <span> <strike> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.