If less rhetoric and opinion in relating supposed 'greenhouse issues' was made, and more notice of the real and physical properties involved with the supposed 'greenhouse' materials, as well as those within Electrical generation and Distribution, was realised, it WILL be possible to still MINIMISE the use of Uranium.

If however, the belligerent few are allowed to maintain the present bullying situation seen so often in discussions, their attempts at unjustified censorship and vilification will only produce a STRONGER Uranium presence.

This is due to the background issues relating to the production of this 'balance of usage' tween now it seems Gas and Uranium NOT being 'opinion based', but reliant on REAL properties of the REAL materials as known commonly by REAL people. It really is that simple.

I have been attempting to avert the widespread use of Uranium now for around 5 years, and still the few SAME 'sad cases', operating from behind anonymity, are still persistent in their harassment of me, even NOW still when the path to Uranium is getting OBVIOUSLY shorter every week.

There is little reason to expect the current clamor regarding 'greenhouse based climate change' to continue once Uranium is in wide use, the issue WILL be moot, and even in reduced relevance with even partial Uranium usage.

These few will still be in denial regarding the falsehood of the 'greenhouse existence' even when it is finally removed from interest, it would be better if the rest of us just move away and try to organise the sensible use of Gas based Generation as the preferred Base Load utility NOW, else Uranium WILL be the proffered 'big' solution option, requiring fewer utilities.

SO the situation facing the 'few' is that the more belligerent and dogmatic they are NOW, the LESS relevant their 'greenhouse opinion' will be in a few years time. If I was really the 'style' of person these 'few' attempt to 'paint me as'. I would just let it happen, but then we would have Uranium everywhere.

So what is the COMMUNITY opinion, Censorship NOW and then Uranium LATER? That is what the 'few' seem to want....and i will not be ceasing attempts to limit Uranium use and this WILL mean that the questionable 'greenhouse science' is going to continue being 'questioned'.

Your's
Peter K Anderson aka Hartlod(tm)
hartlod@bigpond.com
(The word 'Hartlod' in the registered Trademark of Peter K Anderson.)