'Climate concerns' or remade politics?

"Resistance is self defense"; the rhetoric of self promotion, or the attempt to 'reproduce' a 'platform of protest' that once was based within certain 'economic' principles which came from within a particular 'socio-political background'?

The reality is that there is NOT promotion of 'petroleum dependence' as there is NOT viable any alternative as yet, 'rhetoric' will NOT fuel either electrical power generation OR vehicles and OPINION will not alter this to 'remake reality'.

There is insufficient energy within that Solar Radiation that becomes surface incident to make a 'Solar World' possible, and with conversion of that available energy into 'electrical energy' now around 80%, this should be obvious (it is to most everyone NOT blinkered by 'enviro-politics').

'Wind power' generation of 'electrical energy' suffers from the relatively LOW 'electrical energy production' and then needing to be placed at the far end of long runs of Metal Wire. The reason 'traditional generation' is so 'high powered' is to deal with the 'electrical energy bleed' the Metal Wire grid produces. This can only be overcome by NOT using Metal Wire as the distribution medium for generated 'electrical power'.

Any attempt to improve 'turbine generator' technology will advantage all generation systems using such, NOT just 'Wind/Tide' systems, which includes Uranium fuelled utilities....

The alternative that the G8 will take, if they regard these 'protests' in any manner, will be the 'easy path' now much shorted, to Uranium fuelled generation unless of course more of the sensible and astute amongst us begin to IGNORE the platforming of 'greenhouse concepts' and the SUPPOSED 'greenhouse warming / climate altering' non-science that IS leading us all into the Uranium Age. Pollution is an important consideration, but it is NOT creating either 'greenhouse warming' or 'greenhouse related' climate alterations. The 'effect' is simply NOT possible or viable with regard to the actual properties of the real materials 'it' would involve.

As for the points mentioned in the original 'article', at the point (*), these have ALL been given treatment within this site already and are NOT seen as related to any supposed 'greenhouse effect or even valid SCIENCE:-

** The smaller Islands are infact going to see NATURAL increases in Sea Level, they do need to adapt, the low point of sea level was only 15,000 to 20,000 years ago, and sea level has been rising since then.

** Climate is rising from a glaciation (only 20,000 to 30,000 years before present) and so rising median temperature is NOT unexpected

** Temperature records in a manner of SCIENCE are only 250 years old, attempts at inference from this record ESPECIALLY over the past 30 years is NOT producing any VALID trend of any REAL 'climate process'.

** Greenland is ONLY land covered with ice and has been only COVERED by the last glaciation, now it is being UNCOVERED and the Polar Regions are shrinking BACK to their 'start position'. NOTICE the name 'Greenland'.......

** Polar Bears will MOVE, they are not as silly as some 'protesters' it seems...

** There is no valid 'tipping point, no valid production of any supposed 'greenhouse effect' and no near 'climate catastrophe'...

Also, there is little real 'exploitation', the income from oil sales from the poorer Nations is to garner funds to fight the endemic and pandemic DISEASE inflicting these populations, most with very sort median life expectancies. This has seen comment already, the 'western protestor' seems unable to realise the difference tween a REAL cause, and a 'fabricated cause'. The MAJORITY of the public have no such cognitive problem...

Perhaps the 'G8 protest' should have remained on its original 'economic basis', at least then there was consistency and some element of REAL 'social validity'.

======================================
Welcome to the 'greenhouse induced' Uranium Age.
======================================

Your's
Peter K Anderson aka Hartlod
hartlod@bigpond.com
(The word 'Hartlod' in the registered Trademark of Peter K Anderson.)

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters (without spaces) shown in the image.