On August 16th, 2006 Anonymous (not verified) says:
Well it is clear how 'rotten' things are in the 'environmental movement' when it encourages censorship and vilification of individuals in the attempt to limit discussion to a preferred 'politically correct' output, rather than listen to SCIENCE when it is expressed and encourage real discussion. Then you hear the vocal 'environmentalists' complain as to why the 'public' are not 'responsive' to their 'opinionated rhetoric'...wonder why. Advocates in white coats are still only advocates...
Your's, Peter K. Anderson a.k.a. Hartlod(tm)
From the PC of Peter K Anderson
E-Mail: Hartlod@bigpond.com http://hartlod.blogpost.com/
Well it is clear who 'rotten' things are...
Well it is clear how 'rotten' things are in the 'environmental movement' when it encourages censorship and vilification of individuals in the attempt to limit discussion to a preferred 'politically correct' output, rather than listen to SCIENCE when it is expressed and encourage real discussion. Then you hear the vocal 'environmentalists' complain as to why the 'public' are not 'responsive' to their 'opinionated rhetoric'...wonder why. Advocates in white coats are still only advocates...
Your's, Peter K. Anderson a.k.a. Hartlod(tm)
From the PC of Peter K Anderson
E-Mail: Hartlod@bigpond.com
http://hartlod.blogpost.com/