College students protest coal use on campuses

[AP story]


Sky Robinson a Sophmore at the University of Missiouri speaks out against coal


AP – Sky Robinson a Sophmore at the University of Missiouri speaks out against coal burning power plants as …


By ALAN SCHER ZAGIER, Associated Press Writer Alan Scher Zagier, Associated Press Writer

Wed Sep 16, 8:27 pm ET

COLUMBIA, Mo. – College students from Missouri to Oregon are urging their schools to stop using coal-based electricity in favor of cleaner energy sources ranging from wood chips to geothermal power.

On Wednesday, students at the University of Missouri and other schools nationwide mounted a Sierra Club-led
campaign targeting coal-based power at colleges, whether generated at
on-campus plants or purchased from private utilities. The campaign
began the same day a group of college presidents rallied in Washington
in support of clean energy legislation.

Student organizers said colleges have a societal obligation to reduce and eventually eliminate coal use in favor of renewable energy.
At Missouri, the school used more than 48,000 tons of coal to generate
electricity in 2007, accounting for 80 percent of campus energy use.

A
Sierra Club report singled out UCLA, Oregon State, Indiana, Minnesota,
North Carolina and five other schools along with Missouri. The
environmental group identified 60 campuses with their own coal-burning power plants, including Georgia, Penn State and Virginia.

"University
campuses have been at the forefront of many of the most important
movements in history," said Mallory Schillinger, a senior from St.
Louis County. "Global warming is where the fight is at, and the most crucial part of that fight — coal — is located right here on our campus."

In recent years, several schools have opted to forego campus coal plants in response to student protests and regulatory scrutiny.

A 2007 Sierra Club lawsuit charging the University of Wisconsin
with violating federal pollution standards and a subsequent court
ruling led that state's governor to endorse a $251 million project to
convert the school's coal boilers to instead burn paper pellets and
wood chips.

Northern Michigan University withdrew plans to use coal as a backup fuel in its new power plant after the federal Environmental Protection Agency declined to issue an air permit. The new plant will burn only wood products.

And Ball State University is moving to eliminate coal use as it creates what the Sierra Club says is the nation's largest closed geothermal energy system on its campus.

In response to the protest, Missouri's sustainability office issued a statement outlining its efforts to reduce fossil fuel use.

Among
the projects planned is a new biomass boiler that will replace a
coal-fired unit and reduce the school's coal usage by up to 25 percent.
The school is also a member of a broader university presidents' initiative on climate change.

"We're very proud of our sustainability efforts, but we know we have more work to do," said Steve Burdic, Missouri's sustainability coordinator.

Statewide,
Missouri generates more than 80 percent of its electricity from coal.
That reliance accounts for the state having the fourth-lowest energy
prices in the country, according to the American Coalition for Clean
Coal Electricity.

A spokeswoman for the
northern Virginia-based energy group said the new campaign will hurt
the state's economy and could lead to increased college costs for
Missouri students and their families.

"It's
certainly not a proposal the people in Missouri are going to get
behind," said Lisa Camooso Miller. "What is the cost for developing
these kinds of fuel sources?"

____

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters (without spaces) shown in the image.