Seize BP!

A message from Seize BP about
the Obama administration's new position on BP

The Obama administration has just announced a major shift in its handling of BP and the disaster in the Gulf of Mexico.

For six weeks the Obama administration just said NO to the growing nationwide chorus of public opinion demanding that the government seize BP’s assets in an amount commensurate with the damage caused by their criminal negligence, and that the funds be placed into a trust that could quickly and easily pay for damages and compensation now and into the future as more damages accrue.

Directly on the heels of Seize BP's demonstrations taking place in more than 50 cities -- with more demonstrations occurring every day -- officials from the administration are now announcing a "new" approach to BP: President Obama has given BP an ultimatum to create an escrow fund administered by an independent body for the payment of claims and damages or the White House will invoke its legal authority to create such an escrow account from BP’s assets. He plans to address the country in a nationwide television address Tuesday night and meet with BP executives at the White House on Wednesday.

But what is the reality undergirding the Obama administration's announcement? It may appear that the administration is now close to the demand of seizure of assets for an escrow account unless BP commits to the establishment of such an escrow account on its own accord. There are several key factors:

  1. The administration's 55 days of coddling BP has become unsustainable from a political and public relations standpoint. The government has revealed itself as a subservient appendage to corporate interests. Now they are going out of their way to present a different image.
  2. In recent days, Florida and Louisiana have both made demands on BP that funds be escrowed as a down payment to cover initial damages, totaling $7.5 billion. BP says that it only has $6.8 billion in cash and cash equivalents available. BP itself is reassuring its investors that the damages in the Gulf that BP will have to pay will not exceed $3 billion to $6 billion. It needs to be understood that it is not a lowball estimate of the scope of the damage but a statement of intent, of just how little BP intends to pay. BP is reported to have called its large U.S. stockholders -- J.P. Morgan Chase controls deposits and services for 30 percent of BP's U.S. stock -- to pressure the administration. The administration’s plan for an escrow account may be seen like a get-tough-against-BP policy but still be designed to further protect BP. The telltale indicator will be the amount of BP assets set aside for the escrow fund.
  3. The anger of the people is spreading around the country especially as estimates of the amount of oil gushing into the Gulf are growing exponentially. To be more precise, what is changing is the weakening of the corporate and political cover-up of actual spill volume. Substantial amounts of oil being captured by the new cap are not being processed by BP's on-site tanker because it lacks capacity, so the oil is continuing to flow into the Gulf. BP says it can't get more tankers to the area until July. The relief well planned for August may not even work then.
  4. At the same time, President Obama held what was reported as a "warm and constructive" phone call with the British Prime Minister David Cameron on Saturday in which he recognized that BP "is a multinational company" and reassured Cameron that he did not want to undermine BP's value. Obama had been hoping that BP would suspend its upcoming shareholder dividend (estimated at more than $10 billion annually), but BP has vacillated publicly on whether it intends to do so. The administration is worried that BP might not do enough to placate the public and that the dire necessity of the situation, as evidenced by Louisiana's and Florida's independent demands, will overtake the administration's attempts to appear in control of the problem.

 Seize BP’s position on the Obama administration’s New Approach Toward BP’s Assets

While it is clear that the Obama administration has undertaken what appears to be a dramatic shift in its handling of one part of the crisis, there are two central issues that will indicate whether it is just another sham public relations offensive or something that will make a real difference for the suffering people and communities in the Gulf states: (1) The size or amount of the escrow fund taken from BP’s assets (the real costs are likely to be in the tens of billions of dollars) and (2) that the “real people” of the affected communities, and not corporate and banking representatives or Wall Street lawyers, be selected to be the trustees of the fund.

Seize BP, since it inaugurated the demand to create a trust from seized BP assets, has demanded “that a trust established with the funds seized from BP should be administered by the people from the harmed area. The trustees should include representatives of the fishers, shrimpers, crabbers, unions, small business people and workers in the tourism and recreation industry, local elected officials, clergy, and independent scientists and environmentalists."

Seize BP will continue to organize demonstrations, rallies, press conferences and banner drops, collect tens of thousands more petitions, and engage in the kind of mass grassroots organizing that can, as it already has, shift the political climate in a way no politician can ignore.

Spread the word. Tell your friends to sign up at SeizeBP.org.

Comments

Seize BP response to Obama speech

SEIZE BP RESPONDS TO PRESIDENT OBAMA'S OVAL OFFICE ADDRESS


President Obama needed to be able to say with certainty to the people
of the Gulf Coast, who today go to sleep fearing that they will not be
able to put food on the table, pay their rent or their other
obligations because of the spill, that tonight you can sleep safe
knowing that the funds needed to make you whole would be secured, in
trust, and available immediately.

He did not do it because he chose not to. Not because the funds are
not available or because he lacks the authority. He did not because he
could not get BP to agree and he refuses to treat BP as anything other
than a partner.

BP possesses sufficient assets to place in trust for the victims of
its malfeasance, the massive harm it has caused in its reckless
pursuit of mega-profit.

WHY "NEGOTIATE" WITH CORPORATE CRIMINALS?

Rather than using the power vested in him as President and fulfilling
the obligation vested in him to protect the people, he instead insists
on "negotiations" with an entity that has engaged in
criminal and reckless acts of deadly proportions.

President Obama has been given a choice: Serve the people or be
subservient to corporate interests. The corporate interests of BP are
in irreconcilable conflict with those of the people of the Gulf Coast
and of the United States.

The workers and families in the Gulf Coast need action. Not rhetoric.
Not sympathy and not the channeling, or mirroring, of their anger and
frustration through the figure of the President. Their suffering is
real. Their fears of life-altering catastrophe are well founded. The
coastlines of five states are under attack.

The White House, responding to building national anger and the echoing
cry for relief, brought out all of the symbolism of Presidential
authority and leadership that have been so sorely lacking over the
past two months of crisis. For the very first time in his presidency,
which has seen the financial crisis-to which his administration
responded with a massive banker bailout-Obama used the authority
and the familiarity of a speech from the Oval Office to communicate
directly with the nation as a whole.

LONG ON RHETORIC--SHORT ON GUARANTEES

This was to be the defining moment of the President's response
to this crisis, if not the defining moment of his presidency as a
whole.

President Obama did not deliver. He did not deliver specifics about an
escrow fund; specifics about the size of a proper trust account;
specifics about how it would be administered; specifics about whether
all wage-earners who have lost their income would be able to get
immediate compensation. Again long on rhetoric, painfully short
on details or the minimum guarantees that people require. President
Obama reiterated his imposition of a six month moratorium on deepwater
drilling but refused to pledge to use BP funds to compensate all oil
workers who will lose their incomes as a result of the
moratorium.

The U.S. government has the authority, under the Commerce Clause and
other legal means, to secure the financial relief that is needed.
President Obama has the authority of his office. His party commands
majorities of both the House and the Senate. Collectively, the U.S.
Constitution gives these institutions the fullest power of the state
to act in ordinary times and in an emergency, to exercise its massive
legal authority under the Commerce Clause.

The U.S. government will either allow BP to externalize the costs of
its damage, shifting it onto the backs of the people whose lives and
economies and ecologies will be damaged potentially for decades. Or it
will hold BP responsible for the harm which it has caused.

We are not even referencing punishment for the completely reckless and
avoidable oil spill. Just compensation. Immediate, ongoing, full
compensation.

Tonight's speech-particularly in what was
missing-projected President Obama's unwillingness to act
in the face of this catastrophe.

His election benefitted from the repository of the people's
aspirations. He promised change. He promised hope. Tonight, for the
people of the Gulf Coast, that promise remains unfulfilled.

Thank you everyone for your support in the past several weeks. We
couldn't have done it without your help. Please click below to make an
urgently needed donation to keep this demand for justice echoing loud
and clear.

http://www.pephost.org/site/R?i=4jJrtmxlyRkrRtjk8LvIXg..


UPCOMING DEMONSTRATIONS

WASHINGTON, D.C.
Wednesday, June 16, 12 noon
White House
while Obama meets with BP executives

LOS ANGELES
Thursday, June 17, 5 pm
CNN Building
6430 Sunset Blvd.

NEW ORLEANS
Friday, June 18 at 4:30 pm
Protest at Halliburton Offices
601 Canal St.


Forward this message
http://www.pephost.org/site/R?i=OchTNE7dCNo-VNX50S4xkA..

Share on Facebook
http://www.pephost.org/site/R?i=5NafNdNtzewSnnumDltMiQ..

Share on Twitter
http://www.pephost.org/site/R?i=Pp9QN9Fujvf8N3cSNy_ghQ..

Follow us on Facebook
http://www.pephost.org/site/R?i=7KBZyQylcczbX7s5hlfB0Q..

Follow us on Twitter
http://www.pephost.org/site/R?i=gqlaSif9GmdfTVuo6y2Ehg..